TraderGav.com

Gav's trading blog - Perseverance, Consistency, Confidence

blogs

Examing the MMA, Indicatorian approach

by 8 Comments

I was thinking if I am going to post this article which I wrote some time back. It makes me sound like a indicatorian (Gavipedia: Indicatorian refers to trader who can’t live without indicator). In fact, I hardly look at indicator. Oh well. This is a season of sharing. I am sharing something that I find to be useful. In case, you are interested in Multiple Moving averages ,as mentioned in my previous post ‘Defining a trend”

I take a deeper look at Multiple Moving averages. Though I don’t like the idea of manipulating price by using indicator, I gave it a try and I think it is useful. The basic idea of Multiple moving average(MMA) is to view the trend as two band of moving averages – short term band and long term band. MMA has provided a great visual of trend, but, how should I quantify it in case I need to integrate into my system?

I obtain an idea from Leon Wilson, Author of “The Next step to share trading success”. (I am not sure if the book is available in U.S, at least, I can’t find it in Amazon.) He is an truly “indicatorian”, and according to the description in the book, he trade stocks for living. He derives something called MMACD (MACD of Multiple Moving averages) Ok, here are the steps I quantify MMA by following his suggestion.

1. Take the combined value of moving averages for each short term band and long term bands. So, now we have two lines instead of two bands of moving averages.

2. We want to measure the distance between short term band and long term band. When the distance goes extreme, you know a bubble is forming and potentially we can expect a pull back. I display MMACD into percentage form.

MMACD=[(short term – Long term)/long term]/100

3. For a better view of the changes, we add in a trigger line. We do not want to establish a Long position when MMACD is below its trigger line. (reverse for short position)
trigger= 9-period Moving average of MMACD

So now we have a new indicator to analyzed Multiple Moving average. An Indicator for an indicator? OMG. Well, It is just some mathematics work to help me in reading Multiple moving average. And personally, I find it to be helpful to analyze trend.

MMACD

I have been using this in swing trading of stocks. And I am looking for the possibility of implementing it in day trading as well. Before you start mesmerizing this MMACD, you gotta understand the concept behind MMA. Check out the links in my previous post “Defining a trend“.

Ok, here is the indicator I have programmed for Tradestation, just in case, some of you are interested in trying out. Pull in GMMA into your chart and MMACD. Observe the behavior. Shoot me some comments if you have other view. Just another tool, dump it if it confused you.

Trading Plan: Defining a trend

by 13 Comments

Here we go. The postings for the coming weeks are all related to the subjects/tools that I am studying and implementing into my trading plan.

The first thing I need to know before I start a trading day is to evaluate if I am potentially facing a trending day or another choppy one.

There are different strategies for different types of market conditions. It is the most frustrating when getting chopped out by the market. I had tons of this kinda experience in dummy trading. The main reason? I was bowling in a tennis court, I hurt my arm and damage the court.

Two tools caught my attention. Average Directional Index and Guppy Multiple Moving averages.

I am looking at a longer time frame for this purpose. For example, if I were to trade off a 15-min chart, I will be looking at 10 times of 15-min which is approximately a 120-min chart to evaluate the trend.

The idea is to see a bigger picture. I would layout a 120-min chart with 200 SMA and ADX (Average direction index). I am not interested in the ups and downs of 200 SMA. Instead, I am focusing on the slope of it. I am ONLY looking for Long if it is sloping up, and Short if it is sloping down.

That’s not all. I start looking at ADX.

One major function of ADX is to determine if a futures/stock should be traded with a trend-following or non-trend-following system.

Right tools at the right time, give you the ‘right’ result.

ADX was introduced by Welles Wilder in his book New Concepts in Technical Trading Systems. Some explanations can be found on stockcharts.com as well.

ADX does not generate buy/sell signal for me. Instead, it is showing me the strength of a trend. This is the key point.

When ADX is below 20, it shows a lack of a clear trend. So, trend-following systems will face some whipsaws here and there. On the other hand, when ADX is rising and crosses above 20, it shows a trend is building up and gaining strength.

So, be happy, dummy traders. Some said when ADX falls from 40, it is showing a trend is pausing and steps into the consolidation phase.

In addition to the ADX, I browsed through my library last night. ‘Trend Trading’ by Dalry Guppy again caught my eyes. Mr.Guppy introduced Guppy Multiple Moving averages(GMMA). TraderMike wrote about GMMA before. It is used to view the nature and characters of a trend. It not so much of helping to make any decision, it does give me a feel and insight into the trend.

I have done some simple programming to display GMMA in Tradestation.
Some people are sharp enough to look at the chart and shout “It is trending”. I am not. I need some forms of analysis and tools to help. But, anyway, the point here is to make sure I am trading the right strategy in the right market condition.

Coming soon.. I am looking at Candy sticks…Oops…I mean Candlesticks…

Here are some ideas and readings I have found on the internet.

 

More on ‘The next trade is more important’

by Leave a Comment

More on Next Trade Is More Important

I decided to relook again my previous posting on “Next trade is more important‘. I discussed briefly on experience of having a string of winning days. Now I am looking at the losing experience. It seems to be a common problem among traders. Well, I made the same mistake on tuesday’s trade as well. Coincidently, ugly was having the similar problem yesterday.

What is the relationship between my E-mini S&P trade and Gold trade? Absolutely NO. But, at the psychological side, trader has a tendency to relate them. This is similar to the theory of points and line.

In the same dimension, it is easily for one to connect two points and make it a line, though these two points are, in fact, have no logical relationship

I find it to be so true in trading. When I had one or two losses in a row within a trading day, unintentionally, I become cautious. I do not want to lose money again and I do think that the probability to success today is low, since I had made two losing trades before. So, I assess the third trade in a different approach, (though I still think that I am following the darn trading rules!). I am eager to take profit now when I see the candle is narrow at the top of chart, (well, that’s lucky if the position is in the money) or I am moving stop loss to break even point far too early, just to avoid losing money, again. Oh, not again!

I do not have a concrete treatment for this kinda of psychological problem, since I am not a psychiatrist. To me, the best solution so far, is to stop trading for the day if I have two 1-R losses in a row. Because, I KNOW MYSELF. I am just not cool enough to make another trade immediately after 2 losses.

Anyway, market is always there, let’s fight another day.